Freaky Timing
Apr. 24th, 2007 01:50 amI recently posted the results of a personality test I’d taken and saved on the desktop who knows how long ago. What’s particularly odd is that today, when I checked my Gmail spam folder, I had an email dated Saturday the 21st from the personality test site.
Apparently I took this test on August 19, 2006, and it seems I’m “a particularly unusual personality type” so they’d like very much to have me take the new version of the test to see if it still identifies me the same way. So, I followed the link and found this:
( Read the rest of this entry » )Welcome Back Control Group!
Please read the following FIVE items before continuing.1. We don’t want your money. You are part of the control group. That means that you are being an incredible help to the site. You will be compensated for your time with a free membership on this site for a full year from the full launch date (which is likely to occur in about a month). The whole project really isn’t about money, you are not here to pay anything.
2. The first two trial tests were on PersonalityExpert.com and Perex.com. Now that this is entering the final, production phase the project has been renamed and relocated to eChemistry.com.
3. The site is still under construction, so don’t be surprised by that. You are being invited back because we need your answer set to help train the new system which will be publicly released soon. You shouldn’t be surprised that there are many features of the site that aren’t up yet.
4. To take the test, you have to sign up for a new account. Your old account on PersonalityExpert.com did not get transferred.
5. MARRIED PEOPLE: You were particularly helpful in the development of this test, and we really appreciate the time you’ve given to this project already. You are welcome to pass on your personality code to up to five single people so that they may register for free accounts. We’d prefer to keep the new system clear of married people so that we don’t mistakenly match a married person with other users.
Originally published at Chrystalline. You can comment here or there.